| On April 8, 2026, Argentina´s Congress approved a reform to Law No. 26,639 on Minimum Environmental Protection Standards for the Preservation of Glaciers and the Periglacial Environment (the “Reform”), reshaping the legal framework governing glacier and periglacial protection. While the amended text formally preserves the law’s core declaration that glaciers are public goods and strategic freshwater reserves, it amends the scope and operation of those protections by making them conditional on verified hydrological function and on determinations made by provincial authorities. Under the original law, glacier protection operated automatically and comprehensively: all glaciers and periglacial geoforms were presumed protected by virtue of their existence and their role as water reserves. The Reform narrows this approach. The protection is now linked to whether a glacier or periglacial environment fulfills specific functions, namely acting as a strategic water reserve or contributing to the recharge of hydrographic basins. This functional criterion is central to the amendments and appears consistently throughout the Reform, affecting how protection is triggered, maintained, or lifted. One of the most consequential changes introduced by the Reform relates to the National Glacier Inventory. Whereas the original law conceived the Inventory as a technical registry underpinning an automatic and extensive prohibition regime, the amended framework converts it into a selective and adaptive instrument. Although glaciers and periglacial geoforms included in the Inventory are initially subject to protection, Article 3 bis establishes a specific mechanism allowing their exclusion if the competent environmental authority determines that they do not fulfill the required hydrological functions. Once such a determination is made, the formation in question is no longer covered by the Glacier Law and is instead subject only to general environmental legislation. |

| The Reform also strengthens the powers of provincial governments. Provincial environmental authorities are now explicitly responsible for identifying which glaciers and periglacial environments meet the functional criteria that trigger protection. While the scientific role of the Argentine Institute of Nivology, Glaciology and Environmental Sciences (IANIGLA, for its acronym in Spanish) is formally maintained, its work on the Inventory becomes dependent on provincial inputs. This is particularly relevant because the IANIGLA had not perfomed the last phase of the Inventory, consisting in identifying on the ground the status of each geo-form identified through satellite images. Therefore, several geo-forms that were identified through satellite images did not correspond to active glaciers when inspected on the ground, but were nonetheless “included in the Inventory”, creating disputes as to their protection. Moreover, the amended law clarifies that omissions in updating the Inventory do not affect the validity of permits granted by provincial authorities, reducing the Inventory’s capacity to operate as a binding constraint on development. Restrictions on activities such as mining, hydrocarbon exploration, industrial development, and infrastructure remain in place, but their application is no longer automatic across all glaciers and periglacial environments. Instead, prohibitions apply only to those areas that have been identified as functionally protected. Environmental impact assessments continue to be required, but the amended framework places greater discretion in the hands of local authorities to interpret what constitutes a relevant alteration and whether activities may proceed. |